![]() ![]() ![]() Test was conducted on the 7.5g iPod Classic, originally came with 160Gb hard drive. While in actual use the runtimes will be shorter, it still provides a very useful comparison of the different storage mediums. ![]() The test is pretty simple – load up each storage option with the same music, hit play and see how long it takes for the iPod to shutdown. Making their debut is the iFlash-Solo and iFlash-Quad, it will be very interesting to see how 4 MicroSD’s compare against the fullsize SD cards used in the iFlash-Solo & iFlash-Dual.ĭuring April 2016, all the SD iFlash adapters were updated to a new platform (internally named iFlash85), with this new platform I have squeezed a little more efficency out of the chipset as well as reducing power and startup times – however, the agressive power saving used in the iPod’s means that the iFlash board sits idle most of the time, so this will not result in much change in the final runtimes compared to the previous platform. Here is the 2016 runtime shootout results. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |